"I feel like the verdict was based on emotion and not the real true issue, which was copyright infringement,' the singer told Access Hollywood

By Michael Miller
Updated March 20, 2015 07:25 PM
Advertisement
Trae Patton/NBC/NBCU Photo Bank/Getty

Pharrell Williams isn’t happy with the outcome of his “Blurred Lines” copyright infringement lawsuit – and now he’s blaming the jury for misunderstanding the case.

“It was shocking,” Williams told Access Hollywood, of the verdict, which awarded the Marvin Gaye estate $7.3 million for copyright infringement.

But the singer, 41, added, “I think, when you look back at it, I think the jury voted on emotion.”

“This is my opinion – I feel like the verdict was based on emotion and not the real true issue, which was copyright infringement,” Williams said, adding bluntly, “There’s no copyright infringement.”

He continued, “If that verdict stands, people can’t be inspired by anything, companies can’t be inspired by anything, or else they’re liable for suit.”

And the artist is determined not to let the ruling blur the lines between inspiration and copyright infringement.

An attorney for Williams and the song’s co-author, Robin Thicke, filed paperwork that called the jury verdict “inconsistent” and announced plans to file a motion for a retrial, according to The Wrap.

“This case was about copyright infringement and three out of 22 notes does not denote copyright infringement,” Williams told Access Hollywood.

“It’s the law and so we believe that the law will be upheld, so we’re not worried,” he added, referring to a possible retrial.

RELATED: Keith Urban Is ‘Shocked’ by ‘Blurred Lines’ Verdict